Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan Faces Criminal Defamation Trial: Akpabio, Yahaya Bello to Testify in High-Stakes Case
In a dramatic twist that continues to stir political controversy across Nigeria, the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) High Court in Abuja has named Senate President Godswill Akpabio and former Kogi State Governor Yahaya Bello as prosecution witnesses in the ongoing criminal defamation trial of Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan.
The case, filed by the Federal Government of Nigeria, accuses the suspended Senator representing Kogi Central, Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, of making highly defamatory allegations against two prominent Nigerian political figures during a live television appearance. With tensions already high following her recent suspension from the Senate, this trial is drawing national attention, with significant political and legal implications.
Background: Who is Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan?
Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan is a vocal Nigerian politician, lawyer, and social activist known for her grassroots engagements and bold political stance. She was elected to represent Kogi Central Senatorial District under the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) and has often been outspoken about political corruption and injustice. Her political rise has not been without friction, especially in the traditionally conservative and male-dominated political sphere of Kogi State.
Details of the Criminal Charges
According to court filings dated May 16, Akpoti-Uduaghan is the sole defendant in a case that could have far-reaching consequences for her political career and personal freedom. The Federal Government is prosecuting her under Section 391 of the Penal Code, Cap 89, Laws of the Federation, 1990, for allegedly making defamatory statements “with the knowledge or having reason to believe that such imputation will harm the reputation of a person.” This offense is punishable under Section 392, which includes potential fines and imprisonment.
The charge stems from a televised interview where Akpoti-Uduaghan reportedly made grave accusations against both Senate President Godswill Akpabio and ex-Governor Yahaya Bello. In one of the most explosive parts of her interview, she said:
“It was part of the meeting, the discussions that Akpabio had with Yahaya Bello that night to eliminate me.”
This statement alone has become the focal point of the prosecution’s argument, which insists that such a claim amounts to criminal defamation, especially without verified evidence.
In another segment of the interview, Akpoti-Uduaghan questioned the motives of the Senate President in very strong terms, stating:
“Let’s ask the Senate President, why in the first instance did he withdraw my security, if not to make me vulnerable to attacks. He then emphasised that I should be killed, but I should be killed in Kogi. What is important to me is to stay alive, because dead men tell no tales, who is going to get justice for me?”
These comments, the prosecution argues, are not only defamatory but were made with the clear intent to incite public distrust and damage the reputations of Akpabio and Bello.
What the Law Says: Understanding Sections 391 and 392
To better understand the legal foundation of this trial, here is a brief explanation of the relevant laws:
-
Section 391 of the Penal Code deals with defamation. It states that anyone who makes an imputation intending to harm the reputation of another person is guilty of criminal defamation.
-
Section 392 provides for the punishment, which can include imprisonment for up to two years, or a fine, or both.
This legal framework makes defamation not just a civil matter in Nigeria but a criminal offense, especially when it involves public figures or statements made in the media.
Political Context: A Senate Suspension and Rising Tensions
The trial comes just months after Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan was suspended from the Nigerian Senate on March 6, 2025. The official reason cited by Senate leadership was “gross misconduct,” allegedly related to a dispute over seating arrangements involving Senate President Akpabio. However, many political observers believe her suspension was politically motivated, especially given her vocal criticism of the ruling elite.
Her suspension raised questions about freedom of speech, parliamentary immunity, and whether internal Senate politics are being used to silence opposition voices.
High-Profile Witnesses: Akpabio and Yahaya Bello to Take the Stand
The most shocking development in the case so far is the inclusion of Senate President Akpabio and Yahaya Bello as prosecution witnesses. Their testimonies are expected to be critical, potentially making or breaking the government’s case.
Political analysts believe that if either man appears in court, it would mark a rare moment where two heavyweight Nigerian politicians are directly involved in a public criminal trial — not as defendants, but as key witnesses.
There is already significant public interest in what Akpabio and Bello will say under oath, and whether their testimony will provide clear evidence of defamation or open new political controversies.
Implications for Nigerian Politics and Democracy
This case is not just about one woman’s statements. It touches on larger themes of:
-
Freedom of Expression in Nigeria: Can a senator speak freely about perceived threats to her life, or does that speech become criminal if it affects powerful individuals?
-
Rule of Law and Judicial Independence: Will the courts deliver a fair ruling based on evidence, or will political influence play a role?
-
Women in Politics: Natasha’s case raises concerns about how female politicians are treated in Nigerian politics, especially when they challenge powerful male figures.
What’s Next in the Trial?
As the trial progresses, legal experts expect the court to closely scrutinize:
-
The authenticity of the interview footage.
-
Whether Akpoti-Uduaghan had evidence to support her claims.
-
The intent behind her statements — whether they were made in good faith, or with malicious intent.
The next few court sittings could see bombshell revelations, especially if Akpabio or Bello’s testimonies introduce new facts or rebut key elements of Akpoti-Uduaghan’s defense.
Conclusion: A Defining Moment for Justice and Accountability in Nigeria
The criminal defamation trial of Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan is shaping up to be one of the most closely watched legal battles of 2025. With major political figures involved, and serious accusations being tested in court, the outcome could set a powerful precedent for political accountability and freedom of expression in Nigeria.
Whether the courts rule in favor of the prosecution or the defense, one thing is clear: the Nigerian public is watching, and history is being made.
Stay with NaijaRush.com for ongoing updates, in-depth analysis, and exclusive insights into this landmark case.
